We the People: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court

By Michael J. Perry | Go to book overview

3
The Fourteenth Amendment: What
Norms Did "We the People" Establish?

As I said at the beginning of the preceding chapter, several of the most divisive moral conflicts that have beset us Americans since the end of World War II have been transmuted into constitutional conflicts -- conflicts about what the Constitution of the United States forbids -- and resolved as such. The particular constitutional conflicts I examine in this book -- over racial segregation, race-based affirmative action, sex-based discrimination, homosexuality, abortion, and physician-assisted suicide -- are, in the main, conflicts about what the Fourteenth Amendment forbids. What Raoul Berger wrote in 1977, in Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, is no less true today: "Because the [Fourteenth] Amendment . . . furnishes the chief fulcrum for [the Supreme Court's] control of controversial policies, the question whether such control is authorized by the Constitution is of great practical importance." 1

Some constitutional scholars -- most famously, perhaps, Robert Bork -- have concurred in Berger's unequivocal judgment that the Fourteenth Amendment authorizes little if any "such control". ( Berger has delivered that judgment in many venues, but nowhere more prominently than in Government by Judiciary.) In 1989, in The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, Bork argued at length that section one of the Fourteenth Amendment has been, in the hands of the modern Supreme Court, an instrument of "judicial imperialism". 2 In 1996, citing recent Fourteenth Amendment decisions by the Court, Bork declared that "[t]he most important moral, political, and cultural decisions affecting our lives are being steadily removed from democratic control."3 According to Bork, the justices of the Supreme Court have been "behaving like a 'band of outlaws.' . . . An outlaw is a person who coerces others without warrant in law. That is precisely what a majority of the present Supreme Court does. That is, given the opportunity, what the Supreme Court has always done." 4 Referring mainly to Fourteenth Amendment decisions, the editors of the periodical in which Bork 1996 essay appeared commented on "troubling judicial actions that add up to an entrenched pattern of government by judges that is nothing less than the usurpation of politics. . . . Again and

-48-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
We the People: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 280

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.