Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory

Arlene W. Saxonhouse

The arguments have flown fast and free over the last several years, rocking the academic world: canon or no canon? Is it Western imperialism, misogyny, and racism, or is it the core of civilized discourse over the ages? Are the texts we study and assign to our students culture and time bound, reproducing the white, patriarchal past in a multicultural present or are they to be preserved as the focus of common discourse lest we and our students drown in a sea of relativism? The rhetoric on both sides of the debate has been powerful; moderation has been a forgotten virtue. And the subdiscipline of political theory as the study of great texts written by earlier generations has not been immune to the swirling debates. Indeed, it was a political theorist, Allan Bloom, in his best-selling Closing of the American Mind ( 1987), who did much to bring this issue to public attention and to set the tone for the debate. While this debate has addressed the broader field of the role of education in contemporary American society, challenges from within the discipline of political theory have been launched as well, questioning the claimed apotheosis of certain classic readings: the works of authors such as Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Mill, and Marx. Others have defended this core as being at the foundation of our ability to theorize about the value, purpose, and meaning of political life, and the courses in which students read Plato et al. continue to be included in the curricula of most political science departments.

Political theory as a field managed, though barely, to survive the assaults of the 1950s and 1960s. On the one hand, there was positivism, which denied validity or meaning to the conceptual core of a field that used such inaccessible terms as justice, duty, freedom; on the other hand, there was behavioralism, which dismissed the normative in favor of the empirical. The severest and most powerful assaults of the last decade, though, have come from within. John Gunnell, for instance, claims that the core of authors and readings traditionally included in the study of political theory is simply a "myth," constructed by modern theorists with particular agendas; others argue that those works that have become part of the so-called "myth" survived by chance rather than because of their status as great works, worthy of careful reading, from which we might learn about the nature of politics ( Condren 1985). Yet others have turned political theory into a subfield of history, especially intellectual history, embedding the classic texts in an historical setting of language usage on one side or political experiences on the other. To borrow the language of David Miller describing this movement: "[T]exts that we now regard as classic sink into the landscape" (1990, 425).

Such attacks arise since in many ways political theory is an artificial construct that lacks an independent identity, caught as it is at the cross-roads of a multitude of disciplines. While political scientists may see political theory as a subfield of their own discipline, political theory draws from (and is claimed by) history, philosophy, sociology, literary studies, linguistics, and women's studies. 1 At home in none, but enriched by all, political theory during the last decade has confronted the new threat of the centrifugal force of interdisciplinary connections which have often led to sharply divided communities of discourse. Beyond the isolation from mainstream political science, the sub-specialties of political theory informed by their various inter-disciplinary connections have become isolated from one another. Thus, at the same time that the very texts we might have defined as the unifying basis of political theory are under assault, the activity of studying those texts has itself been drawn in different directions.

It is the argument of this essay, though, that the texts that have come under such powerful and (usually) articulate attack and that have been appropriated by other disciplines have weathered the assaults and remain a central part of the discipline of political science -- though recent trends suggest that their survival is in no sense assured. In part, these texts have survived the attacks of the last decade because political theorists have not established a simply defensive stance asserting the validity


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit OpenDyslexic.org.

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.