Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

(1991, xiv). The challenge for feminists, she argues, is to disrupt cultural representations of an incommensurable sexual difference which organize "the world 'as if' women stood in a derivative (but also opposed) relation to 'man'" (1991, xiv), and, we would add, "as if" that relation were not only immutable but also more socially significant than the relations of race and class.

The instability of the category "women" and of naturalized sexual difference, as demonstrated in the works of feminist theorists, has important implications not only for political theorists, but also for more empirically oriented political scientists. Although these implications will become clearer as the debate over the category "women" continues to play itself out over the next several years, we can put forth a few preliminary observations from the vantage point of the early 1990s.

The work of feminist theorists suggests that researchers in the 1990s should be more cautious and self-reflective about their use of the category "women" than they have been in the past. Most empirical work focusing on women or gender (or even including sex as a control variable) has assumed that the category "women" has an inherent political meaning, that there is something politically relevant, most commonly "interests" (see Sapiro 1981 for a discussion of issues involved in defining women's interests), that all women share. Most empirical researchers believe that by controlling statistically for variables such as race, age, income, and education, they can isolate and measure the effects due to gender. However, applying statistical controls to isolate the effects of gender is not sufficient to deal with the problem of the category "women" as it is posed by feminist theorists. Rather, feminists who have interrogated the category "women" question whether such gender effects, free from the influence of other confounding variables, exist at all -- whether there is any commonality, any essence, or even any interests that all women share after variations in their race, age, education, income, and the like are taken into consideration. Instead, they suggest that race, class, and gender, for example, are so intertwined that all work together to shape identity (or, in this case, political identity). Women exist in an historical and cultural context, and to erase or ignore this context is to gloss over important differences among women.

What does this actually mean for those who do empirical research? First, it means that we should be less concerned with comparing women with men and more concerned with examining how different subgroups of women in different contexts behave politically. If we take the critiques of the category "women" seriously, our research is likely to become more contextual and more historical. It will make visible those women (e.g., women of color, poor women) whose experiences are often erased in the pursuit of scientific generalizations that purportedly apply to all women. Taking seriously critiques of the category "women" will likely move us in the direction of reducing our knowledge claims and our pursuit of universal truths. It will make us less likely to generalize across women (or men) of differing classes, races, cultures, nationalities, ethnicities, or generations. However, what we sacrifice in our ability to generalize (which those who theorize about the category of women would suggest has led only to false or misleading generalizations anyway) will be more than made up for in the depth and richness of our analysis and our understanding.

While empirical researchers who are sensitive to critiques of the category "women" may well become more reflective and self-conscious in their use of the term and more contextual and culturally specific in their approach to research, there are, as we noted earlier, good reasons for researchers not to abandon fully the category that has enabled their work. By using the category "women," feminist political scientists have been able to call into question some of the central assumptions and frameworks of the discipline. The concerted focus by feminists on women and women's experience has helped us as a discipline to see the biases and the blinders that characterized pre-feminist work and to improve our knowledge base by correcting for these biases and removing the blinders. In the same way, the current feminist interrogation of the category "women" may lead to research that will expand and improve our disciplinary knowledge base through greater historical and cultural specificity and more attention to heretofore neglected segments of the population. A major task for women and politics scholars in the 1990s will be to work through the many questions surrounding the category "women," perhaps finding some middle ground between uncritical acceptance and total abandonment of the category. In doing so, feminist scholars are likely to continue to pose new and important challenges to the discipline of political science.


We would like to thank Ada Finifter, Virginia Sapiro, Barbara Crow, Kathleen Casey, and an anonymous reviewer for their careful readings and constructive suggestions regarding this essay.

More recent research has suggested that we should not be so quick to discount the impact of childhood socialization in producing politically relevant differences between girls and boys. (See for example, Bennett and Bennett 1989; Owen and Dennis ( 1988.)
More recent research suggests the relationship between working outside the home and political participation may be less straightforward than once thought. For example, McDonagh ( 1982) has argued that social status variables are more important than employment per se, and Andersen and Cook ( 1985) failed to find a short-term impact from entry into the paid work force although their findings pointed to the possibility of a long-term impact.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.