Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics

David Lalman, Joe Oppenheimer, and Piotr Swistak

Formal political theory is commonly described as the analysis of rational choices and their aggregate consequences in non-market contexts. It resembles economic analysis which is concerned with rational behaviors in market contexts. In other words, the two fields share the same set of assumptions concerning individual choice. Hence they overlap methodologically and differ primarily in the contexts in which the choices are made. Whether the individual is considered as citizen or consumer, he is viewed as consistent in his behaviors. Homo politicus has rejoined homo economicus.

Early contributions to the area were made by researchers trained outside political science. 1 William Riker ( 1958, 1962) was one of the first in our discipline to recognize the importance of the approach for the understanding of politics. Increasing numbers of political scientists followed his lead. For more than a quarter century, the body of formal results and their empirical tests have grown steadily. A number of Nobel prizes awarded for work in the field have brought publicity and encouragement. 2 By now, the field of formal theory (a.k.a. positive theory, public choice, and collective choice) has grown into a major area of research in our discipline. Leading journals such as the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, and the Journal of Conflict Resolution devote a substantial proportion of their pages to formal analyses of political processes. 3 The number of textbooks available at the graduate level has increased substantially over the last decade; many deal specifically with political applications. 4

We recognize that a record of growth and success is not a sufficient recommendation; it certainly does not substitute for careful evaluation. In this essay, we try to describe in what ways formal theory has influenced our thinking about politics.

Our presentation is intended as an introduction for the sophisticated student of political science who may be untrained in deductive methods but who is nonetheless willing to handle abstractions. Our goal is to give the unfamiliar reader a set of simple yet firm intuitions about how formal theories advance our understanding of politics. We do not attempt to cover the field in its entirety. Social choice theory, for example, is not discussed explicitly. Rather, in the interest of portraying the methodological and epistemological factors which have contributed to the field's success, we have chosen to construct this essay around three major substantive areas: voting, collective action, and coalitional stability. Each is discussed separately, even though much of the analysis is in fact interrelated. This is not to say that the discussion is limited to the three areas. We also touch upon the uses of the rational choice approach in other areas such as institutional design, public policy analysis, and political philosophy.

The Distinctive Nature of Formal Theory as a Field

As compared to many fields of specialization within political science, formal theory is unusual. Formal theorists work neither on a particular set of institutions nor on a substantively defined set of political problems. Instead, they often purport to know something specific about what is going on in each of the widely ranging institutional contexts throughout the discipline.

A second distinctive feature of rational choice research is that it is often mathematical. What is more, over the decades much of the mathematics has been refined in its content and reified in its presentation. Today, even for the mathematician, a great deal of technical skill may be needed to comprehend papers in the field. And even with the mathematician's technical advantages, a great deal of reflection is required to comprehend the "political" content of the formulations and their solutions. Unfortunately, these are barriers to entry to anyone wishing to appreciate what has been produced in the field.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.