Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

forward, overcoming in the process conceptual and practical problems that seemed daunting only a decade ago. In view of these examples, and others like them, it hardly seems unduly optimistic to hope for similar gains in other substantive areas of political science in the decade to come.


Conclusion

Quantitative political methodology in the past decade has been a strong growth stock. We see no signs of a downturn in the intellectual vitality of the field or in the quantity or quality of research. On the contrary, there is every indication that further investment will pay even greater intellectual dividends. But what sort of investment is required at this stage? We see the same three glaring needs that Achen identified a decade ago. In each case there has been notable progress since he wrote, but in each case the underlying problem remains far from solved.

First, as Achen ( 1983a, 87) argued a decade ago, political methodologists and political theorists alike need to develop "formal theories with measurement models built into them." Where such theories have been developed, as in the fields of dimensional analysis, survey response, event counts, polytomous choice, and some areas of time-series analysis, significant methodological progress has followed. In the field as a whole, however, there is still far too much data analysis without formal theory -- and far too much formal theory without data analysis.

Second, "to provide for the future, much better mathematical training will have to be provided at both the graduate and undergraduate level" ( Achen 1983a, 89). Our traditional patterns of undergraduate training demand reform; as the research literature throughout the discipline becomes more sophisticated methodologically (and theoretically), it will be increasingly difficult to pretend that an undergraduate curriculum with little or no formal analytical training can provide more than a superficial caricature of the field. The problem is even clearer at the graduate level, with the added difficulty that we must also devote sufficient intellectual resources to train new and more sophisticated generations of methodological specialists. As long as otherwise reputable political science departments rely upon economists, psychologists, and sociologists to supply their graduate coursework in methodology, it will continue to be the case that "the pages of our journals frequently have the look of living rooms decorated at garage sales" ( Achen 1983a, 70).

Third, as Achen ( 1983a, 89) also argued a decade ago, "fundamental research must come to take priority, at least some of the time, over applied work. It should be possible to get funding, publish respectably, and make a career studying the principal agenda of political methodology." In this respect there has been greater progress in the past decade. Young methodological specialists who were graduate students or assistant professors when Achen wrote now fill senior positions in leading political science departments; their students are entering the field's junior ranks in increasing numbers; and their teachers continue to publish not only respectably but with great distinction.

Progress on these fronts has been, and will undoubtedly continue to be, stimulated by the institutional development of political methodology as a subfield. The Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, a goal when Achen wrote, is now a functioning organization with hundreds of dues-paying members. Its annual publication, Political Analysis ( Stimson 1990, 1991b, 1992; Freeman n.d.), publishes a significant fraction of the best research in the field. And its newsletter, The Political Methodologist, is an increasingly ambitious forum for news, reviews, and intellectual debate. Summer methodology conferences at Michigan ( 1984), Berkeley ( 1985), Harvard ( 1986), Duke ( 1987), UCLA ( 1988), Minnesota ( 1989), Washington University ( 1990), Duke ( 1991), and Harvard ( 1992) have provided an important new forum for presenting and discussing methodological research. Many of the articles described in this review were first presented at these conferences. With funding from the host universities and the National Science Foundation, recent conferences have included dozens of graduate students in addition to faculty members from across the United States.

Nevertheless, any survey of the field must recognize that the number of political scientists working and thinking primarily as methodologists is still exceedingly small and that, in the long run, the number and energy of the field's part-time adherents cannot adequately compensate for a dire shortage of trained, committed specialists. As long as most political science departments have more Latin Americanists, urbanists, and voting behavior specialists than methodologists it cannot be surprising that we know more about the vicissitudes of politics in Nicaragua, New Haven, and the New Deal coalition than about the central methodological problems of our discipline. And as long as colleagues in other fields count anyone who does applied statistical work as a political methodologist, and vice versa, we cannot be surprised that our principal methodological agenda remains unconquered.


Notes

The authors thank Simon Jackman, Gary King, Bradley Palmquist, and Paul Sniderman for constructive criticism and advice,

-148-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.