Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory

Kenneth Janda

This essay reviews the state of research on comparative political parties, which I define as the analysis of parties across nations. If your field is comparative politics, my focus should suit you. If you are primarily interested in American party politics, please continue reading. I intend to demonstrate that even students of American parties can benefit from a comparative perspective on their research.

This essay covers only publications since 1980 that take an explicitly comparative approach to the analysis of political parties. Although it refers to earlier writings and to some single-country studies, it does so only to make certain points. This essay does not pretend to cover all important articles before 1980 nor all examples of outstanding research on parties in individual countries. With two exceptions, every citation is in English, which distinctly limits the scope of this review. It does not consider the rich literature on comparative political parties that exists in other languages -- especially in the works of French, German, and Italian scholars. Fortunately, some important works in other languages have been translated into English, and -- even more fortunately for us mono-lingual Americans -- many foreign parties scholars (thankfully most of the Scandinavians) write and publish in English. In fact, more than half the citations herein were written by European scholars and about half were originally published outside the United States.

Because of scholarly ethnocentricity, much of the comparative parties literature escapes the attention of American academics. Consider the findings of Giles, Mizell, and Patterson ( 1989), who surveyed faculty in departments with graduate programs about professional journals. About half of American political scientists were familiar with Comparative Politics (55%) and Comparative Political Studies (46%), the leading U.S. journals in the comparative field. 1 Less than 7%, however, were familiar with the European Journal of Political Research -- a major source of articles on comparative political parties -- or even with The British Journal of Political Science -- another important source. Presumably, even fewer knew about the International Political Science Review, Journal of Theoretical Politics, and West European Politics -- all foreign publications and all frequently cited herein. LaPonce ( 1980) conducted an "import-export" analysis of citations in the American Political Science Review [APSR] compared with the official journals of the other four oldest political science associations (Canadian, Indian, French, and British). He found that all national journals are ethnocentric, but the APSR was particularly so. This supports McKay's statement, "Rarely do American scholars read, and therefore rarely do they cite, European journals" ( 1988, 1052). 2

With some notable exceptions to be discussed below, the parties literature in the U.S. is not strong on comparative analysis. In contrast, the European parties literature reflects the great strength of European political science in structural comparative politics, which McKay defines as "the systematic study of political institutions and processes across several and sometimes many countries" ( 1988, 1054). The American literature deals mainly with home-grown political parties and makes relatively few comparisons with parties in other countries. Of course, the United States is a large country, arguably the world's oldest democracy, and a true superpower -- all of which support the case for studying American parties per se. I argue, however, that limiting focus to American parties limits understanding as well. It is the familiar problem of missing the forest for the trees. The best way to understand the peculiar nature of American parties (and they are peculiar) is to study them in a comparative framework -- which means reading more works of foreign scholars who do such analyses.

This essay on the field adjusts for this imbalance in scholarship in the United States by reviewing recent writings on the comparative analysis of political parties, emphasizing the conceptual bases of the research and theory. Readers are directed to two excellent reviews of writings on American parties -- one by Leon Epstein in 1983 and the other by William Crotty in 1991 -- for coverage of the American literature.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.