Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

10
Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries: Black, Latino, and Racial Minority Group Politics in Political Science

Paula D. McClain and John A. Garcia


Introduction

Political science as a discipline historically has not seriously concerned itself with the politics of America's various minority groups, 1 particularly black and Latino politics. In fact, there was tacit, if not expressed, agreement that some groups within the American political spectrum were not legitimate subjects for political scientists to study. Matthew Holden, Jr. ( 1983) reports that at a 1941 conference on the Interdisciplinary Aspect of Negro Studies, Ralph J. Bunche, the first black American to receive a Ph.D. ( 1934) in political science, 2 lamented that the publication prospects in political science for works on the political behaviors of Negroes were somewhat limited. Bunche continued:

In some field[s] this (publishing] is relatively easy. Anthropologists deal with the Negro as a respectable topic, and the journals of anthropology take such articles without hesitation. In respect to my own field, which concerns the status of the Negro, except insofar as papers having to do with colonial problems and the like are involved, there isn't a very cordial reception for papers dealing with the Negro (quoted in Holden 1983, 34).

Professor Emmett E. Dorsey, the late chair of the department of political science at Howard University, was quoted by Walton ( 1986, xi) to have said, as late as 1964, "Negro politics was long considered an offbeat field of political science." Many viewed it as an "academic graveyard for any young scholar who sought academic respectability..." (p. xi). Holden ( 1983, 34) has characterized the attitude within political science, as well as other social science disciplines, as an attitude of non-interest in "all this stuff about Negroes." Further,

Holden observes that political scientists "did not perceive those black-white relationships in American society to raise critical intellectual problems for scholars, in contrast to raising 'social problems' for social activists." The attention paid to the problems of Latinos within the American political system, as well as Latino-white relationships, was equally nonexistent.

This chapter principally traces and examines the development of the fields of black and Latino politics and their entrance into the realm of appropriate topics for political scientists to study. Current trends and future directions of the two subfields are also explored. Two other emergent fields of study, American Indian politics and Asian-American politics, are addressed as well, but not to the same depth and extent as the other two areas. Our brief discussion of these two subfields is not meant as a comment on the importance and significance of the areas, but is reflective of the paucity of research thus far.

An undertaking of this kind is replete with pitfalls. Principal among them is how one surveys a body of literature to provide a descriptive history of the development of the subfields, while at the same time establishing the analytical and methodological linkages between the various historical periods. 3 Moreover, the importance of political events to the intellectual development and growth of black and Latino politics must also be acknowledged and integrated. Thus one's organizational approach is important.

We have chosen to discuss the subfields separately, focusing on concepts and/or theoretical approaches that characterize the literature at various points in time. There is a tendency within the discipline to assume that similarities in racial minority group status within the United States result in similarities of experiences and behaviors; consequently, blacks, Latinos, Asian Americans, and American Indians are merged under the category of minority group politics. Yet, while there may be similarities in racial minority group status, there are fundamental differences in their experiences,

-247-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.