Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Political Communication: Scope, Progress, Promise

Doris Graber


What is "political" communication? It is the construction, sending, receiving, and processing of messages that are likely to have a significant impact on politics. The impact may be direct or indirect, immediate or delayed. Direct messages may relate to political activities, such as an appeal for votes, or an appeal for support of a policy, or for compliance with a particular law. In the indirect mode, messages may create images of reality that then affect political thinking and action by political elites and mass publics. The message senders may be politicians, journalists, members of interest groups, or private, unorganized citizens. Their identity does not matter. The same holds true for message receivers. The key element is that the message has a significant political effect on the thinking, beliefs, and behaviors of individuals, groups, institutions, and whole societies and the environments in which they exist ( Berelson 1948; Lasswell 1969).

Karl Deutsch has called political communication "The Nerves of Government," suggesting that political messages are the stimulus that produces political behavior. He might just as well have called it the lifeblood or mother's milk of politics because communication is the essential activity that links the various parts of society together and allows them to function as an integrated whole. The substance and form of political messages circulating in a polity, and the images that they evoke, determine the thrust and quality of political life. This is why the study of political communication is an extremely important subfield of political science.

One may question whether political communication is a genuinely distinct field of study, or merely a particular context in which one examines various communication phenomena. This is a legitimate question. The answer is that it needs to be treated as a distinct research focus because communication in political contexts presents many unique challenges for scholars that require specialized knowledge of subject matter and of particular research techniques. Because of its significance to a full understanding of politics, and because of past neglect, much effort is needed to explore all the facets of the subfield.

Political communication is a field with fluid boundaries that is interdisciplinary as well as intercultural. It is interdisciplinary because the questions raised by it require political scientists to draw on sister disciplines, including communication, psychology, and sociology. It is intercultural because political communication features vary among cultures so that it is important as well as instructive to examine them from various cultural perspectives ( Gurevitch and Blumler 1990).

Looking at the subfield from a historical perspective, it is one of the oldest. Scholars from early times on have studied political communication. Confucius ( 551-479 B.C.) and Aristotle ( 384-322 B.C.) taught about aspects of political communication. Cicero ( 106-43 B.C.) and Pliny ( 62-113 A.D.) concerned themselves with the persuasive powers of political oratory. Niccolo Machiavelli argued in The Prince in 1513 that rulers must study human nature so that they can successfully communicate with their subjects in order to manipulate their thoughts and emotions. Machiavelli provided detailed suggestions about the manner in which princes might do that.

Princes and other practitioners of the art of politics have been keenly interested in political communication from early times on, knowing well that success in politics demands that politicians master the art of political communication so that they can influence their constituents' views about the political world. They have attempted to foster the construction of favorable images in the minds of their subjects through various types of verbal and nonverbal messages, including the symbolism of majestic architectural creations and elaborate public ceremonies, and public speeches. They have also sought to mold human minds through brainwashing tactics and terror, particularly during periods of internal struggles and external wars. They have used propaganda of various types and public relations tactics and political advertising


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.