Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

media coverage worsened the impact of the problem ( President's Commission 1979).

As mentioned, several political scientists have explored the possibility of using the news media to spur political development, based on research showing substantial correlations between mass media growth and economic growth in developing countries. Although their hopes were disappointed and most lost interest in these investigations, public optimism has persisted about the power of mass media to provide the knowledge base on which modernization and democratic governance must rest. In the wake of the restructuring of Communist nations in Eastern Europe and Asia, questions of the role that the media will and should play in that process have come to the fore with renewed vigor. Questions relate to the nature of media impact, and the kinds of media organizations most conducive to democratization objectives. For example, it is important to know what part media messages played when Eastern Europe's Communist governments collapsed in domino fashion in the 1990s ( Dennis et al. 1990).

More generally, how does the nature of governmental structures and policies influence the shaping of news? Although such questions fall squarely within the purview of traditional political science, the answers remain a matter of much conjecture and insufficient proof ( Pool 1983; Abramson et al. 1988). In the U.S. context, the neglect is partly due to the extraordinary difficulty of designing and executing such studies. Another factor is the misconception that the reciprocal influences of media and government are best studied abroad, especially in countries with authoritarian governments, because a constitutional wall separates American media from government control ( Fagen 1969; Liu 1971; Mickiewicz 1988).

Most studies of governmental mechanisms for regulating mass media institutions in the United States have been done by historians, communication scholars and lawyers. There is general agreement that all governments constrain the freedom of expression to some degree, and that some limits are needed and must be enforced by the state because self-controls are not effective enough over the long run. But it is disputed where the limits lie and where they should lie. The impact of constitutional provisions and laws like the First Amendment or the British Official Secrets Act on each nation's political life remains ill-defined ( Lichtenberg 1991). We do not know how much of the impact is related to each particular political culture and how much could be transplanted into other political cultures. Much has been said and written on that score, but more often in the popular rather than the scholarly literature. Aside from law books and law reviews, the literature on First Amendment rights and other laws related to political communication, even in the United States, remains sparse.

Among the few political science studies that deal with media policy making in a U.S. setting, Krasnow, Longley, and Terry The Politics of Broadcast Regulation ( 1982) provides a sophisticated mix of theory, description, and analysis. Neuman, McKnight and Solomon (n.d.) discuss policy needs and the political obstacles to policy advances. Many more such studies are needed to cover the broad spectrum of laws that directly or indirectly affect the interrelation of media institutions with other political and economic institutions. They are particularly essential now to guide policies to cope with the revolutionary changes in information transmission technologies and to assist the nations that are moving from totalitarianism to more open systems. In recognition of such needs, the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) and the National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) have commissioned and published several studies to guide public officials in making communication policies ( NTIA 1988, 1990; OTA 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990).


Conclusions

What overall assessments can we make about the state of the subfield of political communication? Looking back at the intellectual journey that we have completed, what features stand out? Obviously, the field is broad and scholars have tried to do it justice by researching many diverse areas. It is equally obvious that the breadth of the field has left much terrain unexplored or insufficiently explored. There have been numerous tentative probes into some areas, such as media use for political development, which were later abandoned. Not everyone is pleased about the breadth of development. What some welcome as diversification, others see as premature fragmentation of the field. They point out that the depth of research individually and collectively, and even data collection, has suffered because researchers are dispersed. As is often true of newly active research areas, the soundness of evidence leaves something to be desired. Current scholarship is better in description of messages -- what they are and who communicated with whom -- than in explaining the reasons for these messages and their effects. But even when it comes to descriptions, our collective ignorance remains enormous.

Election communication is the only area where description is at least satisfactory and where major progress has been made in theories and analyses. Even there, much remains to be done. But the heavy focus on election communication and, to a certain extent, on mass media messages, is the reason why scholars have been

-323-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.