Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Political Executives and Their Officials

Colin Campbell, S.J.

Unlike most work dealing with style, then, Campbell makes a serious attempt to move beyond the personalization of institutions, and he is explicitly concerned with theory- construction and other building blocks of social science. But [presidential] style, as always, proves to be a stumbling block rather than a vehicle for progress -- promoting conceptual confusion, the endless proliferation of relevant variables, and more complications than any analysis can make sense of ( Moe 1990, 44).

The Campbell cited above is none other than your current author. One might legitimately ask whether someone prone to devising frameworks "promoting conceptual confusion..." is the appropriate person for presenting a distillation of the state of political science on the topic of "political executives and their officials." However, this area of inquiry is as old as political science itself. And its major debates have centered precisely on such issues as the complexity of models employed in analyzing executive leaders and their relations with their officials. This does not give one license for conceptual overkill. Yet, it should make us all attentive to the difficulty of reconciling our desire to capture the richness of this subject matter and the need to make sense of it all.

Political science by its nature attempts to focus on moving targets. And, as sub-fields go, executive leadership presents as much flux as any object of political science inquiry. This means that students of political executives constantly find themselves struggling with sharp learning curves as one administration takes over from another or executive leaders face crises or unforeseen circumstances which call upon their adaptive skills ( Rockman 1984, 4-7). Also, just about everybody feels compelled to share views about executive leaders. For instance, my barber has become aware of the "lightening rod" theory of why George Bush kept John Sununu so long. My barber expounds his ideas for all comers -- regardless of whether they make their living studying presidents. Other burning issues to political scientists -- such as how Congress allocates committee memberships -- would bore my barber and most of his customers to tears. Whereas other political science fields attract a lot of deference, presidency and executive leadership scholars compete with an overabundance of conventional wisdom. In this field, attentive publics often actually say on their own the types of things that one hears pronounced in panels at the APSA annual meeting.

One finds a tremendous amount of volatility in this field. From an institutional perspective, however, the presidency remains infinitely more vulnerable to the personality of the incumbent at a given moment than either house of Congress would be to the constellation of personalities that occupy it from time to time. Changes in the balance between the president and Congress due to party turnover or the peculiarities of personality can badly miscue even the most shrewd observers. The profession broadly endorsed John F. Kennedy's inattentiveness to organizational structure ( Neustadt 1960). Political scientists had convinced themselves that excessive institutional rigor in the policy process had led to overcooking issues during the Eisenhower administration. Fred I. Greenstein's revisionist analysis of Eisenhower, however, contests the early critique of Eisenhower -- arguing that his administration achieved a highly adaptive balance between structural and personalized responses to issues ( 1982).

When students of the presidency piled on the anti-imperial-presidency bandwagon after Watergate ( Nathan 1975), we contributed little foresight of the extreme decentralization that characterized the Carter administration. In the aftermath of Carter's failure as a political executive, we were the first to issue glum prognoses for the future of presidential leadership in the face of Congress's ascendancy ( Heclo and Salamon 1981). During the Reagan years, we began to point to the facility with which presidents can short-circuit institutional relationships with other parts of the policy apparatus in Washington -- Congress included -- by going public, pursuing partisan responsiveness, and using foreign affairs, to distract attention from domestic issues ( Kernell 1986; Moe 1985; Rose 1988; Campbell 1986). With the end of the Reagan years and the minimalism of


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit OpenDyslexic.org.

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.