Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

Global Political Economy

James A. Caporaso


Global political economy is not unified by a shared theoretical approach or encompassing methodology. Rather, it is a collection of orientations, perspectives, theories, and methods addressed to understanding the relations between diverse political and economic phenomena at the global level. The world does not look the same from a bank office in Zurich, a maquiladora (border factory) in Mexico, a shantytown in Peru, a rice paddy in Sri Lanka, and a trade office in Washington, D.C. Academics are not above the fray. Neorealists, institutionalists, structuralists, Marxists, deconstructionists, and modern-day mercantilists frame the world differently too.

Without belaboring the obvious, let me briefly describe some of the key axes of disagreement: the actors; the dominant metaphor; and the constitutive principle relating politics and economics. Different theories presuppose the importance of different actors, or even whether actors in the ordinary sense are important at all ( Galtung 1971). Thus, individuals, firms, interest groups, epistemic communities, technocrats, bureaucrats, states, and international organizations are variously posited as the central actors. Neoclassical political economy favors individuals and firms; Marxian political economy favors classes and production relations; dependency theory focuses on transnational alliances of capital (financial and industrial); and realist theory places states at the center.

Each approach is defined by a dominant metaphor and associated theoretical principles. Three such metaphors are the market, the polity, and class processes. Neoclassical economics places the market and voluntary exchange at the center. The portals to politics are guarded by the idea of market failure. Realism and neorealism expand on the role of the state and related ideas of power and domination. The connections with economics are controlled by state officials who set parameters to voluntary exchange and who seek to use wealth to enhance relative power. Politics structures the realm of economics. Class processes are the domain of Marxian political economy. The production, realization, and appropriation of value are thematized. Politics appears either directly in production relations, in the power exercised by owners of capital and bosses ( Marglin 1974), or in the ways in which the state advances the systemic interests of capital, i.e., those interests which capitalists cannot advance individually. Crossing the divides that separate these approaches is not an easy task.

Finally, there are different constitutive principles of global political economy, different ways of framing or organizing the connections between politics and economic forces. While they do not correspond in a precise way with theories of international political economy, the differences among them are important. One constitutive principle takes economics as the primary subject matter and looks at associated political activities. What is economic is trade, technology, debt, and what is political are the activities of bargaining, power, and collective problem solving in each arena, in short, the "politics of trade" (investment, debt, etc.) approach. This approach emphasizes the management of international economic problems.

A second constitutive principle conceives economics and politics as analytically coequal subsystems and theorizes about their interactions. Economics is variously conceived as markets, production, and wealth; politics as states, institutions, and power. Global political economy now involves theorizing about the relations between markets and states or power and wealth at the global level.

The third constitutive principle is that of reduction of politics or economics to the other. I do not use the term reduction the way Waltz does ( 1959, 1979), as the explanation of facts at one level by reference to the facts and relations situated at a different (lower) level. By reduction I refer to the subsumption or assimilation of facts of a political (or economic) nature by concepts of an economic (or political) nature. Reduction here is a conceptual but not a theoretical enterprise. It involves reclassifying and reinterpreting phenomena previously seen as autonomous. The public choice component of


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.