Political Science: The State of the Discipline II

By Ada W. Finifter | Go to book overview

19
Political Conflict, War, and Peace

Jacek Kugler

World politics can be divided into two main strands. One strand is the broad study of war and peace that encompasses the analysis of competition, conflict and warfare; the second equally broad strand deals with the field of political economy and includes political development, integration, trade, negotiations, and political demography. This chapter focuses on the study of conflict (for political economy see Caporaso in this volume).

War is aptly and generally defined by Malinowski ( 1968, 28) as an "armed contest between two independent political units, by means of organized military force, in the pursuit of a tribal or national policy." Levy ( 1983, 51) introduces the more restricted concept of "international war" as "a substantial armed conflict between the organized military forces of independent political units." International war so defined excludes many domestic conflicts that produced enormous casualties such as the American Civil War ( 1861-1865), the Boxer Rebellion ( 1899), or the Russian Revolution and Civil War ( 1917-1921). It also does not include terrorist campaigns such as the protracted conflict in Northern Ireland ( 1969-1991), or guerrilla activities such as those leading to the fall of Chiang Kai-shek in China ( 1949) or to the fall of Batista in Cuba ( 1958). Also excluded are border incursions such as the Sino-Soviet Split ( 1959-1969). Limited punitive strikes such as Israeli actions against Lebanon ( 1967-1991) do not fall under this definition of war, or even protracted confrontations such as the Cold War between the United States and the USSR ( 1946-1989), because they do not qualify as substantial international conflict. The fighting in Yugoslavia illustrates the difficulty of defining war. In the early stages, this is not an international war because competitors are not independent states. Later this conflict also does not qualify as a war because it does not involve organized military directly attached to nations. Thus, using Levy's definition, the Yugoslav conflict has not yet turned into an international war.

Much of the work I report on here deals with Levy's restricted concept of international war, but many generalizations and inferences may apply to conflict in general. 1 Given this conception of war, peace defines all interactions among nations that are a complement to international war. Nations are at peace when no serious contests arise, when disputes are resolved by accommodation or continue to simmer, and, as is frequently the case, when one side yields to the demands of another without resort to force.

The concern with war and peace is so central to world politics that it defined this field for many years. For that reason it is simply impossible to do justice to the whole literature. Let me start this review, therefore, with two important disclaimers. First, in this short space it is not possible to provide a fair summary of all developments in the vast field of international war. Second, even if length were not a constraint, I am a captive of my own interest and research experience. Thus, like a myopic observer looking at an open field through a long funnel, I am aware of minute distinctions among works whose results directly relate to my own research agenda, and still see through this lens, albeit imprecisely, the contributions of distant but directly related predecessors. This intellectual funnel is also a blinder, however, and much of the research on international war that has evolved in directions different from those I chose will not attract recognition and is, unfairly, discarded. Like most reviews, therefore, this is a personal journey through the vast literature on international war that says perhaps as much about my own perspective on war and peace, as about the development of this vibrant branch of world politics.

To provide a guide, let me first outline my general perspective on the field. The study of war and peace is still chaotic because an agreement on a general paradigm to study this subject has not been reached. 2 My review emphasizes the war literature that clearly specifies general propositions, and places such propositions under empirical scrutiny. Such systematic study of war and peace is in the early stages of development, and today's findings will no doubt be seriously revised and perhaps reversed in the next decade. Yet, a body of theory supported by evidence is now available that provides hope for large theoretical gains in

-483-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Table of Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Theory and Method 1
  • 1: Texts and Canons: The Status of the "Great Books" in Political Theory 3
  • Conclusion 21
  • Notes 22
  • Bibliography 23
  • 2: Political Theory in the 1980s: Perplexity Amidst Diversity 27
  • Notes 43
  • Bibliography 43
  • Additional Bibliography 46
  • 3: Feminist Challenges to Political Science 55
  • Notes 72
  • Bibliography 73
  • 4: Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics 77
  • Concluding Comments 97
  • Notes 98
  • Bibliography 101
  • 5: The Comparative Method 105
  • Conclusion 116
  • Notes 117
  • Bibliography 117
  • 6: The State of Quantitative Political Methodology 121
  • Conclusion 148
  • Notes 148
  • Bibliography 150
  • Political Processes and Individual Political Behavior 161
  • 7: Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory 163
  • Conclusion 183
  • Notes 184
  • Bibliography 185
  • 8: The Not So Simple Act of Voting 193
  • Notes 213
  • Bibliography 214
  • 9: The New Look in Public Opinion Research 219
  • Notes 240
  • Bibliography 240
  • 10: Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries 247
  • Conclusion 269
  • Notes 271
  • Bibliography 271
  • 11: Citizens, Contexts, and Politics 281
  • Conclusion: Putting the Puzzle Back Together 299
  • Bibliography 300
  • 12: Political Communication 305
  • Conclusions 323
  • Bibliography 324
  • Political Institutions of the State 333
  • 13: Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance 335
  • Conclusions: Behavior, Institutions, and Theory 354
  • Notes 357
  • Bibliography 357
  • 14: Public Law and Judicial Politics 365
  • 15: Political Executives and Their Officials 383
  • Conclusion 402
  • Bibliography 403
  • 16: Public Administration: The State of the Field 407
  • Notes 423
  • Bibliography 424
  • Nations and Their Relationships 429
  • 17: Comparative Politics 431
  • Conclusion 443
  • Notes 444
  • Bibliography 446
  • 18: Global Political Economy 451
  • Conclusion 474
  • Notes 476
  • Bibliography 477
  • Conclusions 483
  • Conclusions 503
  • Notes 504
  • Bibliography 505
  • Appendix 511
  • Contributors 513
  • Index of Cited Authors 517
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 538

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.