International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 4

By Jay M. Shafritz | Go to book overview

R

RAINY DAY FUND . A sum of money set aside by a government during normal times, to be drawn down during periods of fiscal stress.


Rationale and Operation

Rainy day funds are primarily a tool of state government finance, because most states are prevented from using deficit finance. Thus, in order to deal with unanticipated downturns in state revenues, states can build up a surplus of funds during normal times that can be drawn down when revenue growth declines.

The legal prohibitions on deficit finance vary in their details from state to state, but most states can simply build up a surplus of general revenues in one year that can then be spent in later years. Alternatively, they can set up explicit rainy day funds to be used to alleviate fiscal stress caused by recessions or other problems. Surplus balances built up in general revenues, outside of explicit rainy day funds, can be used to mitigate fiscal stress, but three factors work against a state's building up general revenues. First, a legislature has many pressures to spend money, making it difficult for a state to build up revenues to begin with and making the revenues it does build vulnerable to being drawn down in later years, whether or not the state faces any fiscal problems. Second, a state's prudent accumulation of general revenues may signal its taxpayers that taxes can be cut. (One of the factors leading to the passage of California's Proposition 13 in 1978 was the large balance of general revenue funds held by the state.) Third, many states have constitutional requirements limiting the amount by which general revenues can accumulate. Thus, states have an incentive to set up explicit rainy day funds, which are built up during normal years and drawn down when states experience fiscal stress.

The establishment of explicit rainy day funds is a relatively recent development in the United States, prompted in large part by fiscal crises that the states suffered during the 1982 and 1991 recessions. In 1982 only 12 states had rainy day funds, but the number increased to 44 states by 1994.

The provisions of these funds vary significantly from state to state. Some states require that money be deposited into their funds, but others have no requirement. Certain contingencies need to occur in some states before money can be withdrawn. Other states allow withdrawal of funds at any time, subject only to majority approval of the legislature. Some states have capped the amount that can be placed in their rainy day fund, and others have not.

The evidence suggests that, on one hand, states have been relatively prudent in not withdrawing rainy day funds until fiscal problems pushed them to do so, meaning that explicit withdrawal requirements have had little effect on the performance of the funds. On the other hand, states without an explicit requirement that money be deposited into their rainy day funds have been lax about building their funds up, so they have found themselves more underfunded than have states with explicit rainy day deposit requirements.


Fiscal Stress and Rainy Day Funds

During the 1950s and 1960s state government budgets grew much faster than in the 1970s and 1980s, partly because states expanded their tax bases and partly because they increased tax rates on the bases they already taxed. Because of more rapidly growing revenues before the 1970s, states did not suffer widespread fiscal problems until the early 1970s. State fiscal problems during the 1970s might have been viewed as being a part of recessions and slow growth at the national level, but hindsight has shown that states have had significantly more severe fiscal problems in the 1970s and after, when compared to earlier decades. By the 1970s, state taxes had already risen significantly, and taxpayer resistance to new increases was beginning to grow. During the recessions of 1982 and 1991, many states ran into significant fiscal problems because their spending commitments exceeded their revenue growth during those recessions. It was in response to these fiscal crises during recessionary periods that many states established rainy day funds.

Even though states can set aside general revenues during good years and use those surplus general revenues to augment expenditures during recessions, explicit rainy day funds offer a number of advantages. First, because the money is set aside for budget stabilization purposes, it is insulated to a degree from demands for additional expenditures. There will always be a greater demand for government expenditures than there will be revenues to fund those expenditures, and an explicit rainy day fund helps to enforce the fiscal discipline to save during good years in order to help smooth expenditures over the business cycle. Second, a surplus of general revenue funds can lead to a call for lower taxes, which would defeat the purpose of setting the money aside as general revenue surpluses. Third, some states have explicit provisions to prevent the accumulation of excess general revenues, which in some cases require at least a partial refund of tax collections that exceed expenditures.

The cyclical nature of tax revenues is not the only reason states might want to set aside rainy day funds. Revenues might also be desired in the event of a bad revenue forecast, or as a result of changes in federal tax laws

-1901-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 4
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Editorial Board *
  • Title Page *
  • R 1901
  • S 2019
  • T 2205
  • U 2297
  • V 2325
  • W 2377
  • Z 2429
  • Index 2437
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 2504

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.