Inside Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Procedures for the Determination of Offenses against Discipline in Prisons of Britain and the United States

By Bayard Marin | Go to book overview

8 Judicial Review: Judicial Intervention in Prison Adjudications

The most obvious distinction between Britain and the United States in judicial review of prison matters is volume. While the British legal digests and reference works reveal only a few dozen cases dealing with all aspects of prison management,1 the equivalent American materials2 contain ever-growing numbers far too extensive to include more than a selective summary within the limited scope of this chapter. As the prison-law writer puts his pen to the page, there is very likely an American case pending on the subject of his research which might be decided before his ink dries.

The first part of this chapter will be devoted to a general history of American judicial intervention in prison disciplinary matters. Since there is a considerable body of American case law on prisons capable of being divided into numerous subtopics, it will be necessary only to lay a frame-work initially, leaving more detailed analysis for the next portion of this chapter and succeeding chapters. On the other hand, the comparatively modest number of cases in Britain makes topical analysis somewhat difficult. It will therefore be useful to set out the development of cases relating to judicial review of prison disciplinary matters in Britain chronologically and exhaustively with some reference back later on. The fact that such a detailed case-by-case history has not been done elsewhere should sufficiently commend this approach.3 More importantly, however, it should provide a continuum so that cases which might otherwise be read out of context to foreshadow prisoners' rights may be readily placed in historical perspective.


United States

"Hands-Off Doctrine" and Its "Abrogation"

The blaze of judicial activity in the United States is a relatively recent phenomenon. For a long time the courts maintained a safe judicial distance from prison disciplinary matters, electing to invoke what is now called the "hands-off doctrine."4 This doctrine is traceable back into the nineteenth century, when judicial review of administration in general was not very commonplace and prisoners were among the less-than-favored classes. Perhaps the earliest expression of judicial noninterference was Ex parte Taws,5 an 1809 case in which a prisoner by writ of habeas corpus challenged the conditions of his confinement. A United States District Court in Pennsylvania denied relief to the prisoner, but even then recognized that there might be circumstances when a different result should obtain. Said the court,

-224-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Inside Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Procedures for the Determination of Offenses against Discipline in Prisons of Britain and the United States
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page 3
  • Contents 7
  • List of Tables 11
  • Foreword 13
  • Acknowledgments 15
  • 1 - Introduction 19
  • 2 - Organizational and Statutory Structure 29
  • 3 - Offenses 47
  • Notes 80
  • 4 - Punishment Practices 89
  • Notes 119
  • 5 - The Determiners 130
  • 6 - Hearings: Procedures 162
  • 7 - Judicial Review: Some Constitutional Comparisons 216
  • 8 - Judicial Review: Judicial Intervention In Prison Adjudications 224
  • 9 - Access to Remedial Sources 289
  • 10 - Remedies 327
  • 11 - Conclusion 380
  • Appendix 1 - Procedures Questionnaire 386
  • Appendix 2 - Outline for Empirical Observations 388
  • Selected Bibliography 390
  • Index 399
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 418

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.