the Scientific Credibility of ESP," Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49 (1979):415‐ 429]; and "Comments on Rao's Article on the Scientific Credibility of ESP," Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50 [ 1980]:502). Skinner, B. F., "Card Guessing Experiments," American Scientist, 36 ( 1948):456-462. Stevens, S. S., "The Market for Miracles," Contemporary Psychology, 12 ( 1967):1-3. Szasz, Thomas S., "A Critical Analysis of the Fundamental Concepts of Psychical Research," Psychiatric Quarterly, 31 ( 1957):96-108. See also the synopses of papers presented by Antony Flew, John Taylor, C. E. M. Hansel, Trevor Hall, and E. J. Dingwall at the Rationalist Press Association's Annual Conference, 1975, with a critical report on the conference by Carl Sargent and a reply by Nicolas Walter, all in New Humanist, 91 ( 1975):175-185.
Finally, we would call readers' attention to a growing number of papers relevant to the psi debate by sociologists of science: Collins, H. M., and T. J. Pinch , Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982). "The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific Is Happening," in Roy Wallis, editor, On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge (University of Keele: Sociological Review Monograph 27, March 1979). Pinch, T. J., and H. M. Collins, "Is Anti-Science Not Science? The Case of Parapsychology," in Helga Nowothy and Hilary Rose, eds., Counter-Movements in the Sciences ( Boston: R. Reidel, 1979), pp. 221-250. Koefed, Peter A., and Willem A. Verloren van Themaat , "The Rejection of Parapsychology Research Results," paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Atlanta, Georgia, Nov. 5-7, 1981.