THE MAKESHIFT ECONOMY OF POOR WOMEN
In early modern England there were sexual divisions of labour; some work was considered women's work, other men's. Although these divisions might vary regionally--for example, in a few areas women undertook ploughing, although mostly this was men's work--yet in all places there were types of work deemed proper solely for women or for men. The gender order of society was both expressed and defined in terms of work. Contemporaries were troubled at any disturbance of the division of labour.1 Ballads such as The Woman to the Plow and the Man to The Hen-Roost mocked reversals of work roles and implied that such reversals turned the world upside-down.2 One hypothesis to be tested here is that the higher the social level, the more rigid were the divisions between men's and women's work. The lower the status, the more likely it was to find men and women engaging in similar tasks.
Class or social divisions were also reflected and reinforced by the nature of work which individuals performed. No ladies could engage in manual labour and retain their status. Yet while noblewomen and poor labouring women performed different kinds of work, there were nevertheless some common features. Irrespective of social status, wives were responsible for housekeeping and child-care.
A history of women's work requires that we consider what work they performed at different social levels. This chapter focuses on what Hufton has termed the 'makeshift economy' of that large proportion of the female population who were poor;3 the next, Chapter 6, on the work of the____________________